Difference between tagged and untagged port

Closed
Tiseb Posted messages 64 Registration date   Status Membre -  
brupala Posted messages 111930 Registration date   Status Membre Last intervention   -
Hello,

I am doing an internship at a high school, and I am working on VLAN switches.
So I have a report to write.
I started drafting the theoretical part, and I found plenty of documents and websites on VLANs.

The only problem is that I can't find anything useful about tagging. I would like to know the difference between a tagged port and an untagged port.

If someone could provide an answer or knows an interesting website on the topic, it would be great.

Thanks.

--
Seb

7 réponses

pbleue
 
Hello,

Here it is:

When defining the ports associated with each VLAN, there are 3 modes: Untagged, Tagged, and No:

Untagged: The port is associated with only one VLAN. This means that any equipment connected to this port will be part of the VLAN.

Tagged: This means that the frames that arrive and leave the port are marked with an additional 802.1q header in the Ethernet field.
A port can be "tagged" on multiple different VLANs.
The advantage of the Tagged mode is the ability to have a server that can communicate with all stations in the VLANs without the VLANs being able to communicate with each other.

No: No configuration in the VLAN.

Regards.
203
oups
 
Hi!
So if I understood correctly the definition of tagged ports from the blue pbleue, I'm setting up my VLANs by service (accounting, etc.) all untagged (that way they don't communicate with each other);
and for production servers, logins, etc., I set the ports to tagged, so all VLANs can access the servers (and therefore the stations can work ;) ) but I also set the ports of the computer service's stations to tagged so they can both manage the servers and access all the stations on the VLANs (with VNC for example).
Did I understand everything correctly please ^^?

Thanks in advance.
0
brupala Posted messages 111930 Registration date   Status Membre Last intervention   14 417 > sbixo
 
normal,
that's what VLANs are for.
your server should route between the 2 VLANs.

--
and ... There you go!
2