View original (French)

Amazon order with Nasdas credit card.

Closed
Lucas -  
bazfile Posted messages 58480 Registration date   Status Moderator Last intervention   -
Hello, today I placed an order using the credit card of a donor named Nasdas (so it’s not my credit card) and I accidentally entered my address as the billing address. My order has been successfully processed, but the issue is that I'm wondering if I will have to pay for it myself or if I have already paid for my order with Nasdas's credit card.

4 answers

Answer 1 / 4
fermiparadoxx Posted messages 11454 Registration date   Status Member Last intervention   6 108
 
Hello,

The order has already been paid using the payment method provided at the time of order validation.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading the responses is good... Responding afterward, for the sake of politeness, is better...
3
brucine Posted messages 24668 Registration date   Status Member Last intervention   4 143
 
Hello,

As far as I remember, Amazon, unlike other sites, records a proof of payment: if we change it, it makes sense that they could ask for proof of this new payment method.

Not taking them for more foolish than they are, they could not have failed to notice such a volume of transactions on this famous card coming from a considerable number of "customers," which would inevitably lead the card in question to run out of funds quickly.

I have never understood the purpose of an "influencer," no one should dictate what we should do or buy, yet it seems they are paid for it, and I'm only talking about legitimate income; the question of how the individual in question reached such a financial level remains open.

But what is certain is that, at his level of followers, each new post can be sponsored for
€15,000-€20,000 and more: so it's clever, even if he hasn't calculated that the "gift" in question could not be honored, since to the detriment of the "suckers" he has solicited, he will have pocketed the profit from the post in question plus, supposedly, that of at least 100,000 new subscribers.

Or the art of getting rich without doing anything at the expense of people since, ultimately, the brands' advertising, admitting it sometimes does not lead to dubious commercial sites, is paid for by the end consumer.

To answer the question, if there is one, I see no one under these conditions receiving their "purchases" except perhaps if the first ones had slipped through the filters and had already been shipped, the bonus being that in this way, one would have blocked their own account...
1