View original (French)

Teamviewer Host or Teamviewer Classic?

elzaimer Posted messages 15 Status Member -  
laurent425 Posted messages 94 Status Member -
Hello,

I regularly remote support my family members (viruses, false manipulations, Windows maintenance...)
I have been using the Quick Support version until now, but sometimes the person is not in front of their PC to give me the indicated password.

I am therefore considering installing either:
- the classic version of TeamViewer (with a fixed password)
- the Host version.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of each for this specific use?
- more/less resource-hungry
- more/less suitable for this use
- etc...

Is the Host also free for private use?

Thank you.

3 answers

Answer 1 / 3
elzaimer Posted messages 15 Status Member 4
 
In my opinion, the classic version is indeed suitable... but when I read this on the TEAMVIEWER website, I wondered if the HOST version might be even more suitable:
"TeamViewer Host runs as a system service and allows constant access to remote systems, including session opens and closes and remote restarts - ideal for server maintenance and remote work."

Would it be more "lightweight" as it is only intended for controlling the workstation and not taking over another workstation? Because the classic version does both, I believe.

The fact that they specify that this version runs as a "system service" would be an advantage?
7
Answer 2 / 3
laurent425 Posted messages 94 Status Member 6
 
Hello,

I use Teamviewer at work.
I recommend using the classic version, which seems more suitable to me.

I did the same thing on my relatives' PC.
0
Answer 3 / 3
laurent425 Posted messages 94 Status Member 6
 
Indeed, the host version would be sufficient in your case.
0