Difference between a 2-core and a 4-core processor?

bloodevil Posted messages 44 Status Member -  
titi 86 Posted messages 1873 Status Member -
Hello,

A friend intends to buy a new PC and since I know a bit about it, I decided to help him out. But I have to say he stumped me with a question: For the same price, will a dual-core processor offer better performance than a quad-core processor?

I'm giving the example with INTEL, for a similar price of around €170, between the E8400 processor (2 cores) at 3.0 GHz with 1333 MHz bus frequency and the Q8200 processor (4 cores) at 2.33 GHz with 1333 MHz bus frequency.

Anyway, I thank you in advance for your answers, feel free to provide plenty of explanations lol.

Best regards, Bloodevil.
Configuration: Windows XP Firefox 3.0.5

6 answers

  1. As-I-Am Posted messages 7178 Status Contributor 798
     
    Hello,
    In a single application, the E8400 will be more efficient due to its higher frequency, but with many simultaneous applications, the quad will perform better because it has more cores.
    --
    Thug Life
    14
    1. Fllorian-R Posted messages 150 Status Member 6
       
      What As-I-Am says is totally true ;)
      If you are going to use several heavy applications at the same time, like Photoshop + Pinnacle Studio...
      I advise your friend to get the 4-core.
      But if it's just for running MSN + Mozilla + iTunes, it's better to get the 2-core (Although the Quad will be perfect too ;))

      Anyway, it's up to you (or your friend) to make the choice, but if it's at the same price, I would take the 2-core, because it has more GHz (to keep it simple..)
      :D
      Best regards.
      0