Suspended Facebook account: a surreal decision?
Othman-luciano Posted messages 108 Status Member -
Hello*
Very reserved when it comes to (a)social networks, I had created an account that I only used in a rather passive manner: no "friends," no messages from me, and no reactions of any sort, so a confidentiality that is likely abnormal for FB. I only followed a few official organizations without interacting. However, I created this account with a pseudonym. According to a notification from FB, I did not comply with the community "standards"... Given what I had already read on FB, I really don't see how my use of FB can be problematic... The pseudonym perhaps?
Thank you in advance*
(*) Basic elements of politeness added by CCM moderation!.......
4 answers
-
Hello,
I must admit I am surprised by your intervention. What were you expecting from such an undoubtedly asocial network? Perhaps you are familiar with or have read the following work: click here
The surrealism of an account suspension is nothing compared to the harsh reality and ultimate purpose of the algorithms that govern this network. At the user level, what is it really for? Your "passive" use does not at all align with what the designers expect, which is to be an incredibly effective tool for mass formatting, but that’s another story. You will have no trouble doing without it.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
See you soon,
PN44-
Hello,
Beyond the real or assumed utility of social networks, Facebook (or others) is far from free and relies on a business model that constantly seeks to increase its profitability.
Therefore, it is entirely conceivable that it directly seeks to reduce the cost represented by the management of inactive accounts, or indirectly considers that, if they are inactive, they do not generate the revenue generated by advertising or data commercialization.
More broadly, and without even referencing the GDPR, many commercial sites or forums delete inactive accounts after a certain period of time.Thank you for your comment.
You demonstrate obvious insight and pragmatism. You rightly mention the General Data Protection Regulation, which, in the case of (a)social networks, is at best relative, and that's an understatement. Beyond the evidently concrete, aggressive, and insidious mercantile aspect, I see it as a vector for mass manipulation of a formidable effectiveness. We can detect some positive aspects, fortunately, but the risks regarding variable confidentiality are very real. Each person has their choices, as long as they are prepared to face the consequences. (A)social networks? Too much of it is hardly enough...
You are repeating yourself and the question isn't even there.
For my part, I see no interest in social networks and I fully stand by my thought, I do not use them.
Those who do the opposite want to be convinced that a system which is tentacular and free, at least on a direct level, would offer any persistence of data and any support and they scream like stuck pigs when their professional use is interrupted; personally, one can live more easily without it.
The system is unreliable and it is entirely at the mercy of Facebook's arbitrary decisions with no recourse, and as is regularly illustrated, the rest is just hot air, but one must be ready to accept the consequences; you cannot contest the use of a free service, you know this when you sign up.Hello,
One cannot contest the use of a free service, one knows this when signing up.
Free yes and no, whether it's Facebook or something else, you have to subscribe to a plan and pay to have internet.
And I won't even mention the cost of electricity and the price to pay for the hardware, whether it's for a PC or a phone.
Free has been dead for a very long time.
Hello,
You're playing with words and you know it, almost everyone has an electricity subscription and nowadays also internet access, which will not cost more or less regardless of the sites they connect to.
There isn't a category of sub-citizens who are perfectly fine having an internet subscription to watch TV, possibly make phone calls, connect to their bank, do their shopping, or handle administrative tasks online... without ever visiting a forum and even less a social network.
The Facebook service itself is free in exchange for the profits that Meta derives from it; no contract binds it to ensure its sustainability or support, unlike for example a software I would have purchased or a paid online service site where the contract I enter stipulates that I am entitled to certain support in exchange for my fees.
-
-
Good evening,
Yes, but there's nothing we can do here, you need to address that with Facebook!
https://fr-fr.facebook.com/help/497895248412837
@support.facebook.com
<<In certain cases, as described above, we will seek to obtain additional information about an account before taking actions that may range from temporary account restrictions to permanent deactivation.
- Accounts present a false identity (only Facebook and Messenger) by:
- creating an account using a name that is not the true name used in daily life.>>
- Accounts present a false identity (only Facebook and Messenger) by:
-
Hello, I would like to share with you a recent story: my account was disabled on Facebook because my profile picture was the Meta logo. They suspended my account because they thought I was a robot.
Best regards
-
Link to the aforementioned book https://www.editions-larousse.fr/livre/reseaux-asociaux-9782036008038/
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
See you soon,
PN44