FAT32 or NTFS
Lutin
-
HUNTZINGER -
HUNTZINGER -
Hello everyone
many say that NTFS is better than FAT32
what are the advantages and disadvantages?
if NTFS is better, why leave the option of FAT32 during the installation of XP?
thank you in advance for your responses?
many say that NTFS is better than FAT32
what are the advantages and disadvantages?
if NTFS is better, why leave the option of FAT32 during the installation of XP?
thank you in advance for your responses?
10 answers
-
What did your research on the forum yield?
-= Fu Xuen =- -
-
Hi Lutin, the NTSF allows for better file management on disks over about 10GB, plus it offers file protection that is not possible with Fat32.
-
However, FAT32 is slightly faster than NTFS in access time (read/write). But we're talking milliseconds!
Signed: The Ghost (Follow the shadow of AVALON) -
Hello
Fat32 is for when you're not on a network and NTSF is for when you are on a network, if you're not on a network you can use either Fat or NTSF. -
-
Thank you for your responses
[quote] NTFS allows for better file management on disks over 10GB, as well as file protection that is not possible with FAT32
However, FAT32 is slightly faster than NTFS in access times (read/write). But the difference is measured in milliseconds [/quote]
According to my research, this is what it indicates
But unfortunately, it does not answer my question
Why does Microsoft leave the choice between FAT32 and NTFS during installation, given that NTFS is more reliable?
Is it a compatibility issue with logs?
In any case, I thank you for your responses. -
Hi
FAT32 and NTFS have nothing to do with the network, the difference between the two is the better management of the file system, the size of the clusters changes, resulting in less maintenance and defragmentation and more stability at the OS level.
Choosing NTFS or FAT32
When you install XP you have the choice between two types of file allocation systems. FAT32 organizes data on the hard drive in clusters of 32 bits, and NTFS stands for New Technology File System belonging to Windows NT, which is the basis on which XP was developed.
A disk formatted in NTFS ensures better optimization of storage space. For example, for a 32 GB disk partitioned in FAT32, a cluster occupies 16 KB. Thus, for a file of 17 KB, it actually takes up 32 KB, the equivalent of two allocation units, one full unit of 16 KB, and another almost empty of 1 KB.
For NTFS, this unit only weighs 4 KB; if we take our 17 KB file, it then occupies five clusters and its weight is reduced to 20 KB.
For NTFS, the maximum size for a partition is 16 TB (terabytes). The management of large files (such as audio or video) is enhanced. Also, security is better.
If the disk has bad sectors, they are automatically taken out of service, while write errors are immediately corrected.
The only downside of NTFS is its incompatibility with Windows 9x and Me. This is why, during the development of Windows XP, the FAT32 system was retained in the case of a multiboot
http://macmicro.chez.tiscali.fr -
thank you for this remarkable and clear response, it's exactly what I was expecting
thank you again
greetings to everyone -