Installing Linux on HP EliteBook 1030 G3
jns55 -
I own a Lenovo ThinkPad X230 laptop that overheated a bit, the fan is rattling and hardly spins. It happened again after it had been functioning more or less normally. So I’m giving up on this PC.
Additionally, I own a HP EliteBook 1030 G3 laptop bought on Leboncoin, but I was a bit taken for a ride because the battery discharges quite quickly; it probably has not been replaced.
Also, I tried to reuse my laptop (official Windows 11 is installed on it), and when I started it, I got a black screen.
I shut it down by holding the power button for several seconds, but when I turn it back on, it tells me that Windows is effectively corrupted.
So, I’m not really keen on dealing with Windows anymore, but I’d like to install a Linux distribution other than Linux Mint.
A few years ago I tried Vanilla OS, which I liked the style of, and on another forum a person, JNS55, recommended Solus OS if I recall correctly.
Is it really good, or should I steer toward another Linux distribution? Knowing that I like the style of Vanilla OS and Solus OS and that my first idea, according to JNS55’s suggestion, is Solus OS (which I couldn’t get to install on my Lenovo X230 for an unknown reason).
However, back when I tried to install Linux on my EliteBook, I ran into errors related to the BIOS, I think, which refused to let me install Linux.
Could you please offer your help so that I can install Solus OS (or another Linux OS with the same style and as good as Solus OS and Vanilla OS) on my HP EliteBook laptop, please? Knowing that the EliteBook 1030 G3 BIOS is quite complicated and a bit recalcitrant.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Eglantier
16 answers
-
jeannets Posted messages 28442 Registration date Status Contributor Last intervention Ambassador 6 613
Yes, it’s indeed "Snoopy" snoopy means "curious" or "snooping" in English
Dog breed which first appeared on October 4, 1950
But in my avatar it signifies more serenity and calm at the edge of a Canadian lake.
The NVMe SSD is the modern version that replaces the mechanical "Hard Drive" by a card of memory components... Not RAM and not CPU. Although electrical power is also very necessary for its operation.
-
jeannets Posted messages 28442 Registration date Status Contributor Last intervention Ambassador 6 613
YES, nowadays, it’s really not much..!! at least we should know what this CPU is..?
Or something else, prevents the CPU from running faster... Either hardware or software..
-
Hello,
I am surprised to see discussions about which distributions are optimized or not. Between two distributions, a given software is relatively identical.
Even recompiling your software yourself by disabling features you deem non-essential (as allowed, for example, by the Gentoo distribution, which I do not recommend for novices), the performance gain is marginal.
However, several things can slow the machine down:
- An environment and applications that are too heavy. The extreme case is when RAM runs out and the system has to resort to the hard drive (swap) to get by. Therefore, on old computers you should favor a lightweight environment (Cinnamon is a good compromise between lightness and ergonomics).
- Some useless applications are launched. The ideal is to install a minimal distribution and install what you need gradually. But that requires knowing which software meets which need and being comfortable with the package manager. In this case, a Debian-type distribution is perfect. For a less tech-savvy audience, a Debian-based distribution such as Ubuntu (or one of its variants, Xubuntu, Kubuntu, ...) and Mint (MATE or Cinnamon variants) are more suitable. Indeed, more things will be installed, but once the installation is done, there will be little left to install.
Then I was quite surprised to see (cf #25) a regret between Ubuntu 24.04 and Ubuntu 26.04. To use Kubuntu on some machines, moving from Qt5 to Qt6 and to the new KDE version is quite significant (in ergonomics, customization, and rendering). And moreover, it would suggest that one should stay on older versions with all the problems that entails (security holes, obsolete software, more complex updates to implement later, etc.). Regardless of the distribution chosen, it is always better to take the newest possible version.
However, be careful, recent distributions may have trouble running on old BIOSes (I had this case on some ASUS Zenbook laptops). That is why it is always better to update your BIOS before installing Linux.
Good luck-
Hello,
What I judge as non-optimizing are distributions that reduce the level of functionality: a castrated file explorer, more complications compared to older versions, lines of code that no longer work, programs and peripherals no longer functioning, despite a few small novelties, this does not justify, for example, Ubuntu 26 which is catastrophic, and I’m not talking about performing an upgrade, but a format and a laptop released in 2024/25.
What does the fact that a system is recent have to do with it being better? On the contrary, there are plenty of bugs to fix, it’s like playing beta testers, and there is nothing about security flaws; a distribution version is at least meant to be supported for 5 years, the time for at least two new versions to come out before you have to format or upgrade.
Following not only distributions but also their versions, the integration, the ideas, and the ergonomics have absolutely nothing to do with each other; you have to test and see the advantages and disadvantages, it’s not because it’s Linux that everything is the same, and that the library is the same, with backward compatibility, that’s false, we’re not on Windows.
they are lowering the functioning level: castrated file explorer,
I think you confuse Ubuntu evolutions with how the file explorer you use has evolved. Personally I use dolphin and I have not seen any change compared to Ubuntu 24.04
complications compared to old versions, lines of code that don’t work anymore,
I don’t know which compilations you’re talking about (which language, which program...), but in general every language / framework is intended to evolve to improve. Ideally these improvements are supposed to ensure backward compatibility (minor versions). Sometimes drastic changes are needed, which leads to a major version change. And that’s really specific to the projects involved, not Ubuntu.
What does the fact that a system is recent have to do with it, isn’t it better? on the contrary, there are a lot of bugs to fix, you’re playing beta testers, and there are no security issues, a distribution version is at least made to last 5 years of support, the time that at least two new versions are released before you have to format or upgrade.
I think there is a misunderstanding. I will respond for Debian because the naming is more clear than Ubuntu, but the concept is actually the same under Ubuntu. Under Debian, the current development version is "unstable". The one that is relatively stabilized is called "testing" (in practice they are stable). The stabilized one is called "stable". Depending on whether you are a developer, beta tester, or end user, you will use the most appropriate one. Under Ubuntu it’s the same thing, and an Ubuntu is basically a Debian with a few additions. The latest Ubuntu corresponds more or less to a Debian testing, so something stable. You don’t take incredibly big risks using the latest Ubuntu.
By following not only the distributions but also their versions, the integration, ideas, and ergonomics have absolutely nothing to do with each other, you have to test and see the advantages and disadvantages, it’s not because it’s Linux that everything is the same, and that the library is the same, with backward compatibility, that’s false, we’re not under Windows.
Ergonomics is relative to a software (for example a given file explorer to resume your case). It has nothing to do with the system itself.
it’s not because it’s Linux that everything is the same, and that the library is the same, with backward compatibility, that’s false, we’re not under Windows
Sorry to contradict you, but it’s not Ubuntu that writes Firefox or Thunderbird or GNOME or KDE. Ubuntu, like Debian or Fedora, only provides an installer, software via a package manager and dedicated mirrors. The packagers pulled the source code of the project, possibly applied a few patches, then built a package that they made available to their community via their mirrors. The way the package is packaged may result in a slightly different deployment, but essentially, with identical architecture and version, modulo possible patches, the program or library is the same.
To convince you further, know that there are even tools like alien that allow converting rpm packages to deb.
Then the notion of backward compatibility has nothing to do with Windows or Linux. It’s purely the result of the seriousness and technical decisions made by the developers who design the software.
-
-
jeannets Posted messages 28442 Registration date Status Contributor Last intervention Ambassador 6 613
Hello,
If you’re a Solus OS enthusiast, it’s still here: https://getsol.us/
And you can try both on the same PC... It’s best to create a partition for this on the disk and install each OS in its own dedicated partition.
For after-sales support, it’s better to join a Forum
Solus 4.9 Serenity released
-
Hello Jeannets,
Thank you very much for your response and for the links.
I will try Solus OS, and I prefer its graphical style under GNOME to that of Pop OS, unless we can change the black background of Pop OS windows...
Which is lighter between Solus OS and Pop OS? Especially since I have heard (or read rather) a lot of good things about Pop OS.
I will try to install either today or tomorrow, and I’ll keep you posted. Hoping I won’t be confronted again with the BIOS error message on my EliteBook that I encountered the first time a few years ago when booting from the USB key where I had put a Linux distribution, I don’t remember which one.
Best regards. -
jeannets Posted messages 28442 Registration date Status Contributor Last intervention Ambassador 6 613
Hello
I don’t know how to answer, whether heavier or lighter... I didn’t try them... I use Ubuntu and for lighter, I use Puppy... but you have to be very careful, it is always running as ROOT and it installs into RAM... you can do stupid things.
After your tests, you’ll be able to tell us which one is the lightest..!!
-
Good evening Jeannets,
What kind of nonsense?
I finally installed Solus OS. I prefer that one.
However, I don’t have enough experience to know if it’s lightweight or not, because I’m having an issue: the CPU shouldn’t be stressed above 40 or 50 percent I think, because the system is quite slow, especially the software repository, and it took me more than 25 minutes to install 34 updates, whereas with Linux Mint on the Lenovo ThinkPad X230 it was much faster.
I should note that I’m in balanced mode. Moreover, what probably confirms what I’m saying is that I haven’t heard the fan even once since I installed Solus OS.
Anyway, it’s quite slow, as if I were under Windows, but more heavy, it’s weird...
How can I fix the problem?
Thanks.-
Is Solus OS installed on the internal hard drive or on a USB stick?
USB sticks are very slow in access time and that slows everything down.
The version choice depends on the processor..?
Otherwise, I recommend re-downloading the file at https://getsol.us/download/
and reinstalling it in a disk partition reserved for it only.
This PC doesn't have much RAM, which is detrimental.
There you go, I don't have a Miracle solution.
-
-
Hello Jeannets,
Thank you for your help.
Solus OS is installed on the internal hard drive, it’s an NVMe SSD. It’s the GNOME version.
However, when I reconnected the power cable, it was really fast.
So, I’m wondering, if I let the battery drain without the power cable plugged in, does Solus OS go into power-saving mode? I checked, and it was set to balanced...
And I’m also wondering, could installing 34 updates, including a major upgrade to Solus OS, have unblocked this?
-
jeannets Posted messages 28442 Registration date Status Contributor Last intervention Ambassador 6 613
Yes, and during these updates, the PC is busy with background tasks; so it slows everything else down...
The power supply source current is very important for performance...
We must wait until all updates are operational... the NVMe SSD is a good solution for speed... but it also needs power.
-
Okay.
When you say that you need juice for the NVMe SSD, are you talking about the CPU, or the RAM?
The little guy on your avatar reminds me of a comic I read when I was a child; could it be Snoopy?
-
I didn’t know about the English translation. :)
I just restarted on Solus OS and it seems a bit more responsive, but I could be mistaken.
On the other hand, I read somewhere on the Internet this afternoon that some HP EliteBook g3 laptops like mine would limit the processor to a very low frequency under Linux when the firmware or the ACPI driver does not behave as expected. And the problem would be known on certain HP machines when the charger is removed...
-
Hello,
If there is no EFI partition left, it is normal for the installation to crash.
If there is nothing to keep on your disk (Windows partition, for example), the easiest is to erase everything and start from a blank disk. For this, you have gparted installed in your Mint live session (or any other GNOME-based distro; for KDE it's something else)
Launch it, then go to the Devices menu / Create Partition Table. Choose the GPT type (msdos is for a PC without UEFI). You will get a warning message stating that the entire disk will be erased—don't worry, that's normal. After you confirm, you will end up with a completely unallocated disk. Now you need to create the EFI partition: choose Partition / New and specify the size (normally 200 GB is enough, but I recommend setting 500 MB to be safe if you ever run distros that use systemd-boot instead of grub), format it as fat32 and right-click on the partition, choose Manage Flags and select esp.
Apply the changes.
You should now see your disk with the EFI partition and the rest of the disk unallocated. You can start the Mint installation (or another) by choosing the option to use the entire disk; the root partition will be created automatically. You can also create other partitions if you want to manage your partitions yourself.
Gparted manual: -
Hello Jns55,
Thank you very much for taking the time to help me. I did as you told me and I was able to install Linux Mint without any issues.
The system is very responsive, both on battery and when plugged in, perhaps there’s no throttling problem on Linux Mint.
Now, I’ve reinstalled GNOME over Linux Mint Cinnamon as I did on my Lenovo which overheated; I’m too used to GNOME to do without it.
I downloaded an icon pack to replace Linux Mint’s default icons, I just forgot how to install them.
Thanks again for your help, Jns55.
-
Hello,
If you're interested in the GNOME desk, simply install Ubuntu and disable Ubuntu's dash to revert to GNOME by default. No need to tinker Mint for that.
This command lets you do it instantly:
gnome-extensions disable ***@***The Ubuntu dock is just another GNOME extension; you can also install dash to dock or dash to panel instead (you'll first need to install the extensions manager).
-
Hi Jns55,
Darn, I’ve already installed GNOME over Linux Mint before I could see your message.
I had seen how to do it on
Did you mean that I should erase Linux Mint and install Ubuntu instead? Except that I don’t really like Ubuntu (not sure why) and I’ve always had a lot of internal errors and other bug issues with it.
-
-
-
Hello,
I installed a monitoring software last night and I launched it and I saw that the CPU frequently caps at 800 MHz, which isn’t much…
-
Good evening Jeannets,
The CPU is a Core i5 Kaby Lake-R.
In the end, I installed Linux Mint and I no longer have this slowdown issue on battery.
Thank you for your help.
-
Hello everyone,
I see that many of you are discussing Linux. :)
I didn’t follow along because I have a flood in my apartment next to the washing machine for 4 days now, I’ve been mopping up from time to time, even at night, still haven’t found a solution.
By the way, I’d tried Debian, but if I remember correctly, I had a major issue with Bluetooth that couldn’t be fixed back then on my Lenovo X230.
Otherwise, is Fedora good? GNOME by default?
See you soon. :)-
Hello,
"Otherwise, is Fedora good? Under GNOME?"
See for yourself (scroll down the screen and click on the "Fedora Linux startup" button:
Fedora is currently among the most cutting-edge distributions and among the easiest to pick up. Fedora serves as a laboratory for Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
In terms of ease of installation and use, it sits on par with Ubuntu and it does not use snap packages. Its peculiarity is that it uses the default btrfs filesystem.
Personally, to start, I recommend Ubuntu or Linux Mint rather than Fedora, because I find that APT (the package management system used by these distributions, which derive from Debian) is better designed than RPM (the package management system used by RedHat and Fedora in particular). That said, the best thing is to test it yourself to form your own opinion.
-
-
Hello to Eglantier and jns55,
Ubuntu, initially, is based on Debian, a bit like Android skins if you want to make a comparison. Ubuntu is then taken up in a somewhat different way under Linux Mint; that jns must already know this, however, for Eglantier, if you want to have a streamlined and distinct operating system, to echo what JNS said, there is LMDE, Linux Mint Debian Edition, with Cinnamon by default, no xfce or mate, for the latter, without making any modifications.
That’s where I leave you to ponder your choices, Eglantier: you can very well take Debian, already GNOME-based, and try to arrange it as you wish like Mint, or just go with LMDE 7.
Try them in a virtual machine, with GNOME Boxes (machine) under Linux, or VirtualBox under Windows, having enabled BIOS virtualization and the feature beforehand.
-
-
Hello, What he’s looking for is the GNOME desktop with Mint’s reliability and simplicity. Debian itself is an ISO image without a graphical interface on which you can install the desktop of your choice (provided you have the skills and you need them to fine-tune it); indeed there are ISO images of Debian with various desktops pre-installed: but it’s when you want to use certain software or peripherals that you realize there’s always something missing for it to work out of the box. That’s precisely what Mint fixes. Adding GNOME Shell to Mint or LMDE will always end up weighing down an already fairly heavy system. Starting from a Debian live image deprives you of all the configuration tools that make Mint work right after the post-install reboot, which is why I don’t recommend it, because it is not at all beginner-friendly.
-
-
jns55,
Personally, I had tested Debian GNOME version on a virtual machine and I could do essential things, although it indeed doesn’t compare with Mint.
I had installed Ubuntu on my laptop, version 24.04 then 26.04, I was a bit disappointed with the changes, finally, as Églantier had already told me on another discussion topic, Ubuntu is not what is most optimized and relevant as we would like to believe, even the old versions from years ago left me with bad memories back when I was starting.
By contrast, although I didn’t like Fedora Workstation in the older versions I had used before, with Bazite GNOME based on Fedora, I realize that it is very well designed for beginners, in fact everything was initially made so that one has nothing to tinker with in the terminal which itself is moreover very restricted, although there must be a method to unlock that.
With Bazite, updates are simplified, the library is complete and optimized for gaming, retro gaming, free gaming, you don’t even need to type a password to install a program, the ability to clean up files related during uninstallation is also very well thought out.
Then, the tips that allow using Davinci Resolve, Xbox Cloud, game managers like Epic Games, etc... A whole lot of small details very appreciable.
Although a lot is made for gaming, many things are quite appreciable in Bazite, however it is not really made for old machines, unfortunately.
-
Bazzite cannot be compared to Fedora Workstation because it is built on an entirely different concept. At most, it can be compared to Fedora Silverblue, from which it derives.
One could say that it is a Fedora Silverblue dedicated to gaming.
It is an immutable distribution with atomic updates, which means that the operating system is read-only and it is separate from the software that is installed in containers. For security, it is ideal; updates consist of deploying a new system image, they run in the background and require no user intervention (like Chrome OS). At most, every 6 months, the user must give consent to move to the newer version.
Immutable distributions have advantages and are sometimes described as the future of Linux, but they also have drawbacks. Once installed, there is no need to take care of it—great—but installing drivers for somewhat old peripherals can quickly turn into a nightmare. This is why, unlike Fedora Workstation, I do not think it is intended for beginner users to install.
As for installing Bazzite on an old PC without UEFI, it is quite possible despite the contrary claims you may read on the site: I have already installed it on an old BIOS PC (so no UEFI). The trick is to convert the disk to GPT format by creating a small BIOS-boot partition at the beginning of the disk and grub installs just fine in the MBR and in the BIOS-boot partition... cool! I wonder if the developers of Bazzite know this. The same method works to install Silverblue and it works at least for now.
-