Paypal charge by Trombi for automatic renewal.

Hello,

So you find it entirely normal that when subscribing for a year to Trombi and paying via Paypal, a year later they deduct from your Paypal account without clearly asking if you agree to renew the subscription or not.

I find this normal, as long as there is tacit renewal and especially if it is clearly stated in the terms and conditions.

It's like subscriptions without commitment, you pay for it every month, without them asking for your agreement, it's a tacit renewal.

Without wanting to spoil your hope, and as Judge_DT and I have pointed out, it's quite normal since you "sign" every contract accepted by you, which binds you. It's up to you to inform yourself before signing.

Therefore, the merchant has absolutely no obligation to refund you and you will not be able to demand anything. At best, they might make a commercial gesture, but I doubt it given how you may have "approached" them by talking about fraudulent practices. When you wrongly accuse someone, you shouldn't expect them to give you gifts :)

As you, I do not respond with any form of politeness such as hello or hi, as your predecessor did when replying to me.
In my previous email, I was addressing only Mr. Bav.
I see that you align more with the rather shady scammer than with the victim. You certainly must have your commercial and financial reasons.
Have a good weekend.

Firstly, Mr. Bav does not exist; Bav means "yours sincerely," which is, precisely, a formula of politeness.

Secondly, if you responded to "Bav," then it is indeed about me.

Thirdly, I place myself on the side of the law, dear sir (or madam). Just because you are "upset" does not grant you victim status, nor does it allow you to accuse others for shortcomings for which you alone are responsible.

Finally, everyone who responds here is a volunteer and is not linked in any way to something commercial. If you had read the information on this forum, you would know this.
This once again illustrates your inability to take personal responsibility, just as it also highlights your capacity to accuse others without basis or any understanding of what you are talking about.

You came to ask a question, the answer does not please you, that is your problem. We cannot defend people against themselves.

"The 'virulence' was due to your remarks dear DomY, which were not necessarily very nice or very objective, by the way :)

For your information as well, you would be surprised by what you estimate to be my age, as well as that of many of the contributors/moderators right here.

Once again, do not jump to hasty conclusions based on a (and only one) simple abbreviation; it's not worse than s.v.p, n.d.l, adj, adv, c.v, p.s, rem: and many others, very commonly used in the French language, whether in letters or literature. It's making a big fuss over a detail.

However, I accept your apologies. Understand that we are not at the academy but rather on a forum, and that when there are several thousand responses, allowing for some abbreviations that are recognized by the lexicon seems like a good thing for a bad situation.

In conclusion, I can only recommend that you inform yourself as much as possible before making 'statements', less for me than for your own (general) interest.

People who make this effort systematically generally have fewer problems.
I think the rule 'never sign what you have not read' is worth more than the saying; it has value as a precaution.
But if you do not do this, understand that only the fault can fall on you.

Have a good weekend."