It seems there was a new fleeting contribution that leads me to a clarification: when you love, you don't count; it's true in this case.
Besides the four basic operations, for which one cannot develop a pure batch calculator, Professor Salmi, who was one of the few batch gurus in the 2000s, proposed several alternatives for more or less sophisticated scientific calculators, but all of them didn't rely on pure batch but on a third-party utility.
Hello,
Like this?
It seems there was a new fleeting contribution that leads me to a clarification: when you love, you don't count; it's true in this case.
Besides the four basic operations, for which one cannot develop a pure batch calculator, Professor Salmi, who was one of the few batch gurus in the 2000s, proposed several alternatives for more or less sophisticated scientific calculators, but all of them didn't rely on pure batch but on a third-party utility.
See here, tscmd.zip, item 61:
http://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/pc/garbo/pc/link/
Hello
Mine, in this case.
Actually, I made a rookie mistake: I thought the aid requester had created this batch.
But they hadn’t. I should have paid attention.
So, my message was unnecessary.
I self-moderated ^^
++