Install 8GB of RAM on Acer Aspire 8930G

Solved
ilocker9 Posted messages 15 Registration date   Status Membre Last intervention   -  
 Cygrid -
Hello,
I would like to put 8GB of RAM in my Acer Aspire 8930g laptop:
- Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Core Q9000 (2.0 GHz)
- Chipset: Intel PM45 Express, 6 MB Cache L2, FSB 1066MHz
- Graphics chip: Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT 1024 MB, 2815 MB shared
since Acer's website states a maximum of 4GB (bearing in mind it usually has Windows Vista 32-bit).

15 réponses

yoanf26 Posted messages 7647 Registration date   Status Contributeur Last intervention   1 047
 
so putting 8 GB of RAM is completely useless

but here is what you can put

1GB PC3-8500 DDR3-1066 204-pin SODIMM
2GB PC3-8500 DDR3-1066 204-pin SODIMM
4GB PC3-8500 DDR3-1066 204-pin SODIMM

Original Memory:
1GB (Removable) or
2GB (Removable) or
3GB (Removable) or
4GB (Removable)
Maximum Memory:
4GB using a 32-bit Operating System
8GB using a 64-bit Operating System
Number of Slots:
2 Socket

--
Oh My God !!
4
lepsyfou
 
Hi, I bought 2 Kingston memory sticks, 4GB PC3-8500 DDR3-1066 204-pin SODIMM, and my PC starts up but the screen remains black; apparently it doesn’t want to recognize my 8GB, so I tested putting in one 2GB stick and one 4GB stick, and strangely it works. I have the impression it doesn't accept more than 6GB.

I don’t know where you got the information that the Acer 8930 accepts 8GB, but for now it’s not possible.
0
yoanf26 Posted messages 7647 Registration date   Status Contributeur Last intervention   1 047
 
Go to the Ramshopping website.
-2
Pico
 
Good evening,

Same PC, almost the same problem as you, I obtained the following information with Aida64 2.0:

 North Bridge Chipset Properties North Bridge - Intel Cantiga PM45 Intel Montevina platform Supported FSB speeds: FSB533, FSB667, FSB800, FSB1066 Managed memory types: DDR2-667, DDR2-800, DDR3-667, DDR3-800, DDR3-1066 SDRAM Maximum memory amount: 8 GB Revision / Stepping: 07 / B3 Package form: 1329 Pin FC-BGA Package size: 34 mm x 34 mm Technology used: 65 nm Core voltage: 1.05 V TDP 7 W In-Order Queue Depth 12 Memory Controller Type: Dual Channel (128 bits) Active mode: Dual Channel (128 bits) Memory Performance CAS Latency (CL) 7T RAS To CAS Delay (tRCD) 7T RAS Precharge (tRP) 7T RAS Active Time (tRAS) 20T Row Refresh Cycle Time (tRFC) 68T RAS To RAS Delay (tRRD) 4T Read To Precharge Delay (tRTP) 5T Four Activate Window Delay (tFAW) 20T Write CAS Latency (tWCL) 6T Refresh Period (tREF) 7.8 us Memory Slots Slot DRAM No. 1 2 GB (DDR3-1066 DDR3 SDRAM) Slot DRAM No. 2 2 GB (DDR3-1066 DDR3 SDRAM) 


I bought two RAM sticks Corsair (LaptopMemory) 2x4GB (CM3X4GSD1066). Nothing works; combining 6GB in both ways, one stick and two 4GB obviously.

What about CL7 or 9? Can it make a significant difference in functionality?

Why doesn't the laptop BIOS detect a missing or defective RAM by generating an audio signal?

Thank you in advance for your explanations!!
2
fred89210 Posted messages 565 Status Membre 109
 
Moreover, a 32 Bit can use a maximum of 3.5GB of RAM.
--
Best regards, Fred89210.
1
Anonymous user
 
Yes and no. A 32-bit system can perfectly handle 4GB of RAM (it detects it well) but can only use 3.75GB. The rest is allocated to the graphics card for example (shared memory).
--
Felix like a feline, agile like me
0
fred89210 Posted messages 565 Status Membre 109 > Anonymous user
 
I am on 7 32-bit version, it recognizes the 4GB BUT only uses 3.5GB and not 3.75GB.
So as I said, a 32-bit Windows uses 3.5GB of RAM.
--
Best regards, Fred89210.
0
Anonymous user > fred89210 Posted messages 565 Status Membre
 
It's that your graphics card uses 512MB of shared RAM. A 32-bit system can use up to 3.75GB.
--
Felix like a feline, agile like me
0
fred89210 Posted messages 565 Status Membre 109 > Anonymous user
 
Yes, but I'm talking about RAM for running the computer and not the Shared RAM (which is useless) from my graphics card.
--
Sincerely, Fred89210.
0
Anonymous user > fred89210 Posted messages 565 Status Membre
 
Read my message carefully. If your PC uses up to 3.5GB of RAM, it means 512MB is reserved for the graphics card.
--
Felix like a feline, agile like me.
0
Anonymous user
 
Firstly, if on Acer's website they say 4GB maximum, it might be that the motherboard doesn't support more than 4GB of RAM (up to 2GB in each slot).
Secondly, I absolutely see no point in putting 8GB of RAM (even video games will never use more than 2GB on this PC configuration).
--
Felix like a feline, agile like me
0
Reevia
 
You don't see the point?
Personally, I have an Acer Aspire 8930, 4GB of RAM running on Windows 7 64-bit, and I compose a lot on FL Studio 9.7. Since I'm quite focused on orchestral compositions, I use some heavy VSTs like East West Quantum Leap Symphonic Orchestra, or worse, Symphonic Choir with Wordbuilder. And once you've loaded a multi-voice setup in SC plus a keyswitch for cello and another one for violin in SO Strings, I can assure you that with your 4 little GB of RAM, you'll still be scratching your head trying to add the other choirs and strings, brass, and woodwinds! If anything, there’s just enough memory left to add one or two percussion instruments, but after that, it's over (little reference to Kaamelott, by the way ^^)
2
ilocker9 Posted messages 15 Registration date   Status Membre Last intervention   2
 
I know that for now it's useless, but I would like to do it now like this because it works well that I want to install Win. 7 64 bits.
0
fred89210 Posted messages 565 Status Membre 109
 
Yes, but the problem is that your motherboard supports a maximum of 4GB of RAM.
--
Best regards, Fred89210.
0
ilocker9 Posted messages 15 Registration date   Status Membre Last intervention   2
 
Well, I'll wait to have more money and a few years to buy myself a more powerful computer.
0
Anonymous user
 
For the moment, it's better to stick with 32-bit. It is often complicated to find the right drivers for 64-bit, and only programs written to run in 64-bit really work well.
--
Felix like a Feline, Agile like Me
0
fred89210 Posted messages 565 Status Membre 109
 
I totally agree with you, it's better to stick with 32 Bits.
--
Best regards, Fred89210.
0
cHOCho49 Posted messages 1257 Status Membre 169
 
Especially since 8GB of memory is useless.
0
Cygrid
 
64-bit works not only very well but you can only have 8 GB with 64-bit.

No need to be resistant, guys. When you have a dual screen and you want to run Skype + Gtalk in addition to playing your favorite game, you'll switch to 64-bit.

Summon or die.
0
ilocker9 Posted messages 15 Registration date   Status Membre Last intervention   2
 
In fact, my only reason for going on Win 7 was to get the 64-bit version and try to install more memory, but now I believe I will stick with Vista.
0
Anonymous user
 
Oh no, if you can switch to Windows 7, do it, you will gain both in performance and security (as well as all the improvements brought by Windows 7 since Vista).
--
Felix like a Felin, Agile like Me
0
yoanf26 Posted messages 7647 Registration date   Status Contributeur Last intervention   1 047
 
@ felix come on, honestly between 32 and 64 bits it's just about RAM management. on 64 bits (I should specify that I'm on Windows 7 64 bits and I was also on Vista 64 bits) you need to find drivers in 64 bits, I agree, but where I don't agree is that nowadays all hardware works in 64 bits and it's really easy to find 64-bit drivers. for example, a search on the manufacturer's site and even easier with all drivers.com. and as for software, they all work, even 32-bit software works perfectly.

your argument only holds for Windows XP 64 bits, which indeed had major compatibility issues between 32 and 64 bits.

@ ilocker9, if you want to switch to Windows 7 64 bits, seriously go for it because it's not a good idea to stay on Vista. Windows 7 is more reliable and definitely faster than Vista.

@ fred89210, the story about 32 bits is that it manages 4 GB of RAM but it uses some RAM for managing the installed hardware which means that this part is not usable by the user, plain and simple.

--
Oh My God !!
0
Anonymous user
 
Thank you for this clarification. (I will regret installing the 32-bit version of Windows 7 when I also have the 64-bit version).
--
Felix like a Feline, Agile like Me
0
yoanf26 Posted messages 7647 Registration date   Status Contributeur Last intervention   1 047 > Anonymous user
 
You shouldn't regret it; it's just that you're a little afraid to take the step to move to 64 bits, that's all.

But now it's better to do it now than to be forced to in the future.

--
Oh My God!!
0
Anonymous user > yoanf26 Posted messages 7647 Registration date   Status Contributeur Last intervention  
 
Yes, but in the future, will transitioning to 64-bit not be easier than it is now?
--
Felix like a Feline, Agile like Me
1
yoanf26 Posted messages 7647 Registration date   Status Contributeur Last intervention   1 047 > Anonymous user
 
no it will be the same.

on one hand it’s better to go through it now than to be forced to later.

before we were on 16 bits and the switch to 32 bits caused no problems, but it is true that transitioning to 64 bits under XP was laborious, but now there are no more issues.

so if you have the chance to switch to 64 bits as is the case for you, make your transition to 64 bits

--
Oh My God !!
0
fred89210 Posted messages 565 Status Membre 109
 
@ yoanf26 :
Yes, it takes RAM into account but we can't use it, that's exactly what I'm saying.

As for the drivers, I challenge you to find the Windows 7 64-bit drivers for a Canon CanoScan Lide 20 scanner.
There's not even drivers for 32-bit 7 (but it still works).

Now devices are compatible with 64 bits but not everyone changes their hardware often, like me, my scanner works very well and since I don't use it often, I don't want to replace it.
--
Sincerely, Fred89210.
0
yoanf26 Posted messages 7647 Registration date   Status Contributeur Last intervention   1 047
 
If you're afraid of upgrading to Seven, do a compatibility test using this

--
Oh My God!!
0
yoanf26 Posted messages 7647 Registration date   Status Contributeur Last intervention   1 047
 
since the beginning of Seven they have been available

--
Oh My God !!
0
fred89210 Posted messages 565 Status Membre 109
 
Well, what I found on Canon's website didn't work for me.
--
Best regards, Fred89210.
0
yoanf26 Posted messages 7647 Registration date   Status Contributeur Last intervention   1 047
 
ok
no worries

--
Oh My God !!
0
escale777
 
Windows 7 64-bit supports more than 4GB of RAM by default. As for drivers, they are available from Acer and elsewhere. In terms of performance, it has increased.
The question is, does the Acer 8930G support more than 6GB since "lepsyfou" did it, and under what conditions?
As for me, I have DDR3-1066 PC3-8500 CL7, and my research suggests DDR3-1333 PC3-10600 or 10666 CL9 at 8; obviously, the ideal would be a CL7.
0
cyriak02
 
Good evening,
I have the same problem as "lepsyfou", I tried to install 2 sticks of 4GB each on my Acer Aspire 8930 and it refuses to start, however if I put one 2GB + one 4GB, it runs fine. I don't quite understand why since the card can run on 8GB, I am on 7 in 64 bits...
0
boubou02fr
 
Good evening
on my Acer Aspire 8930G-844G32Bn
I tested two 4GB sticks and it doesn't start indeed
with 4GB + 2GB it's fine even though Acer indicates a maximum of 4GB
I swapped the 4GB sticks so it's not a problem with one of the sticks each works well
it seems that we can't exceed 6GB
finally under Seven 64-bit it works perfectly
I work all week with it and no problems to report
0
escale777
 
- so ultimately we can only use 6GB
- however, what type of memory were you using and what memory did you use
- I'm asking the question because it turns out that some acer8930G are equipped with DDR2
- in my case, they are DDR3 original
- at what frequency because here too you can reasonably play from 1066 to 1333 MHz depending on the CL, but more commonly they are CL9 because it's hard to find CL7
- it's digging deep, I'm going to eat chocolate so I don't fry my neurons because finding the info is precisely in this type of forum, because unfortunately we have to say it honestly and thank them, they really suffered for us ;-)
0