Error 2 (net::ERR_FAILED): Unknown error

Closed
Hello,

for a while now I haven't been able to access the internet with Google Chrome, I uninstalled and reinstalled it but this message " Error 2 (net::ERR_FAILED): Unknown error" keeps coming back every time.. has anyone ever had this kind of problem (and found a solution) and if so, can they help me?
thank you in advance & merry Christmas.
Configuration: Windows XP Internet Explorer 6.0

4 answers

  1. Hi, I also have a problem with my laptop when I try to access Google Chrome or IE7, I get an error message even though the PC is well connected because the antivirus is updating as well as the Windows 7 updates.

    For Google Chrome = error 2 (net::ERR_FAILED): unknown error

    For IE7 = Internet Explorer cannot display this webpage.

    Does anyone have a solution to this problem??
    1. A clarification: it is neither malware, adware, or any other virus, nor even the firewalls which are Kaspersky 2011, Malwarebytes, & Adaware; the tests have already been done :-(
    2. Hello.
      Try installing this software - go on Google, ULTRASURF 10.08, search, then download.
      It's a Winzip response, put the file on your desktop, click on it, a small window will open
      minimize it, a yellow padlock will appear at the bottom of your computer on the right, leave it like that, go to your browser, and log in as usual, it should work, just like it worked for me.
      Good luck everyone.
      The problem is, it's a server that uses a PROXY.
    3. No, no, and when you have done ULTRA SURF 10.08 until you want it in 10 something, you are going to take the system restore direction because it's seriously messing up and absolutely nothing is done as they say it will. I didn't do Ultra something for my error 2 but another one whose name I don't remember. We need to stop those extraordinary software tinkers that clean up your registry so well that you can't even find any order in it anymore. Server that uses a proxy, and your sister uses a proxy too, stop saying nonsense, the choice is automatic if you happen to be on a proxy if your config is automatic, you don't have to change anything, you're good to go. In the end, it doesn't break anything, that's the essential part, but you are just wasting your time because it did the cleaning but not in the right order. You understand when you see 10.8, it's new but there are so many stupid things that from 10.0 they are at 10.8 and tomorrow you will see it at 10.15 and the day after, they will change the name from ULTRA SURF to ULTRA SUBMARINE, and you will have to deal with it. The super programmer heroes are great, but what a waste of time they cause us.
    4. I'm back for error 2 on Google, as far as I'm concerned, it's resolved but not without understanding what was causing all this hassle in the firewall and so on. PROXY, forget it, it has absolutely nothing to do with it, everything is running smoothly on that side regardless of modifications, worse, changing the existing configuration causes even more problems (6 system restorations to target this nonsense, on error 2 Google listening only to this coming from PROXY), for me among the different solutions and modifications, I ended up losing track and it was working less and less. The antivirus is the cause of the effect but not that of the operating software. This error 2 for Google comes exclusively from the configuration of certain antivirus. This from the very first installation of the antivirus that does not correct its installation core and then to change, nada, impossible according to the tools it provides for configurations. Kaspersky is the champion, its heuristic kernel is so closed that it can no longer correct the rules originally defined at the installation and those changed in the process, in fact, it pushes back any possibility of coordination between our request and its kernel, result, it no longer accepts network entries (Google certificate it no longer recognizes) as soon as we access Gmail on our menu bar. Why? Because originally, it is commercially paired with someone and it is in the manipulations between Win Live and Google that things happen not on purpose but due to a flaw from the developers who do not pay attention to it. Example. On Kaspersky's internet protection, already integrating Google Gmail is an extraordinary feat, almost impossible, it does not accept it for what it calls learning. Besides, it did not foresee integrating the modification not in Live Windows, but in the passing from the integration of Gmail to live. The result is that its security kernel prints the integration but refuses to allow access to Gmail afterwards.
      Final solution required, it's up to you to see: On Kaspersky Go to my protection, internet, "network" menu, select each prohibited panel, go to modify (in the bottom left) and check allow. This should normally work. And well no nothing, nada, nothing is changeable though, everything is done, change restart and so on, it is however completely accepted without any rule, and well nothing works. Let's change the rules, yes to everything, all panels checked green on the menus that should be, and well no correction, nothing happens. Me, I did everything for more than 24 hours, restarting after each change, grouping them, assembling them and so on, nothing, nada, (in between, deleting caches and cookies)
      The solution, I got rid of Kaspersky for this but also for other reasons that they are very nice but do not respond at all to this problem.
      Kaspersky absent, everything works normally, I have Google in entirety, Windows Office 2010 (32 and 64 bits) in entirety, Explorer, Firefox and everything works correctly from one change to another without any problem. From the internet to the operating file (documents) From MSN to Talk, Gmail, Live, Facebook (there is an issue with privacy for a few months (ads appearing in places normally blocked for 'Me Only' that pass from friends to friends, it's a fact, maybe an "error" and Kaspersky hasn't seen anything in parentheses).

      It was long but it’s a possibility of updates, it resonates with me and in my configurations. Let's be realistic, the illness like the computer virus, to correct them, it often takes specialists who are the origin of what they treat us. Without viruses, no antivirus.